Marian Major McMullan - McMullan Law Firm

Sunday, February 5, 2012

A Small Prestigious Firm with State of the Art Client Service
Firm Overview
Practice Areas
Attorney Bios
E Newsletter
Real Estate FAQ
News & Resources
Attorney Referrals
Success Stories
Internet Resources
Contact Us

 

815 West Markham,
Little Rock, Arkansas 72201

Ph. 501-376-9119
Fax: 501-376-8437


Print This Page
Save To Favorites
Home

News & Resources
Contact Us Today 501-376-9119

News

[02/02] Ryan Homes Announces the Grand Opening of the Savoy Model Home at Greenfield in Windsor Mill, MD
[02/02] Preferred Apartment Communities, Inc. Increases Quarterly Dividend
[02/02] Apartment Industry Continues Recovery, Survey Says
[02/02] MFA Financial, Inc. to Present at Credit Suisse Financial Services Forum
[02/02] PulteGroup Reports Financial Results for 2011 Fourth Quarter

More...

Articles

Title Insurance

Title refers to both the rights of ownership of a particular property and the documents that prove the existence of those rights. Marketable title means that the property's ownership, as reflected in the real estate records, has no problems or only minor problems that any well informed and prudent buyer would accept. Any buyer of real property obviously wants and expects to receive clear title to the property. The buyer expects, for example, that the person selling the property has the right to do so, that all of the owners have joined in the sale, that all mortgage and other liens have been paid (or will be knowingly assumed as part of the transaction), and so forth.

More...

Types of Leases

There are many types of leases available, each with their own advantages and responsibilities. The following is list of the more common types of leases.

More...

Case Summaries

[01/27] Matter of Meruelo Maddux Properties, Inc.
In Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings involving the question whether the debtor was subject to the single asset real estate provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, the district court's holding that the single asset real estate provisions applied is affirmed, where: 1) the debtor, which existed solely to operate a 92-unit apartment complex, could be characterized as a single asset real estate debtor under the Bankruptcy Code; 2) the plain language of the Code gives no basis for a "whole business enterprise" exception to single asset real estate debtor status that would allow the court to consider parent corporation and sister subsidiaries; and 3) the district court did not err in its approach to granting relief from the automatic stay by leaving questions about whether the debtor timely took timely corrective action to the bankruptcy court in the first instance.

[01/25] Otay Mesa Property, L.P. v. US
On appeal from a decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims awarding plaintiffs $3,043,051, plus interest, for the temporary taking of a blanket easement over five parcels of land and limiting the government's liability to the taking of an easement over those five parcels and limiting the period of the taking to April of 1999 to October of 2008, the judgment is affirmed in part and vacated in part, where: 1) the Claims Court erred when it concluded that the government's taking of the easement was a temporary rather than a permanent physical taking, resulting in an erroneous calculation of the plaintiffs' damages; and 2) the Claims Court did not err in limiting the government's liability.

[01/25] General Development Co., L.P. v. City of Santa Maria
On appeal from a judgment of dismissal entered in favor of the City of Santa Maria after the trial court ruled that a developer's petition for writ of mandate was time barred by Government Code section 65009 for failure to timely challenge the denial of a zone change, judgment is affirmed, where the trial court did not err in ruling that City's denial of the developer's rezoning application was a "decision of a legislative body to adopt or amend a zoning ordinance" within the meaning of section 65009.

[01/20] Center for Sierra Nevada Conservation v. County of El Dorado
In a case arising from the County of El Dorado's adoption of an oak woodland management plan and mitigation fee program without an environmental impact report (EIR), the district court's judgment in favor of the county is reversed, where: 1) the county could not rely on an earlier program EIR for its conclusion that the adoption of the plan and fee program would have no greater adverse environmental effect than that already anticipated in the program EIR, and its adoption of a negative declaration; and 2) the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) required a tiered EIR to be conducted prior to the county's adoption of the plan and fee program.

[01/19] Hearts Bluff Game Ranch, Inc. v. US
In a suit for just compensation under the Fifth Amendment for an alleged taking based on the Army Corps of Engineers' denial of a landowner's proposal to operate a "mitigation bank" on its property, the Court of Federal Claims' dismissal for failure to state a claim is affirmed, where the Claims Court did not err in holding that the landowner did not possess a legally cognizable Fifth Amendment property interest in a mitigation bank instrument.

[01/19] Western States Petroleum Ass'n v. State Board of Equalization
In an action for declaratory relief seeking to invalidate a regulation of the State Board of Equalization (SBE) that adopted new valuation formulas for petroleum refineries, the trial court's judgment in favor of the plaintiffs on cross-motions for summary judgment is affirmed, where: 1) the trial court did not err in declaring the regulation to be inconsistent with Rev. and Tax. Code section 51(d); and 2) the trial court did not err in ruling that SBE's economic impact statement did not comply with requirements of the Administrative Procedures Act.

More...

Frequently Asked Questions

What is not covered by title insurance?

What is a lien?

What is a mechanic's lien?

What is an abstract of title?

I've heard about people who have made money by buying property cheaply at mortgage foreclosure sales and then reselling it at a profit. What does this involve? Is it something I could do?

More...

Associated Press text, photo, graphic, audio and/or video material shall not be published, broadcast, rewritten for broadcast or publication or redistributed directly or indirectly in any medium. Neither these AP materials nor any portion thereof may be stored in a computer except for personal and non-commercial use. Users may not download or reproduce a substantial portion of the AP material found on this web site. AP will not be held liable for any delays, inaccuracies, errors or omissions therefrom or in the transmission or delivery of all or any part thereof or for any damages arising from any of the foregoing.

Practice Areas

© 2012 McMullan Law Firm. All rights reserved. Disclaimer | Site Map

McMullan Law Firm represents clients in central Arkansas including; Little Rock, North Little Rock, Benton, Bryant, Conway, Cabot, Lonoke, Mayflower, Maumelle, Alexander, Jacksonville, Sherwood, Hot Springs, Russellville and Pine Bluff. We practice law in counties including Pulaski County, Saline County, Faulkner County and Lonoke County.